CDFG California Outdoors Q&As: When gifted fish become overlimits


by Marine Management News
5-15-2009
(916) 322-8639
Website

CDFG California Outdoors Q&As: When gifted fish become overlimits

Contact: Carrie Wilson, Communications Office, [email protected] .

*** View this column with images online at
www.dfg.ca.gov/QandA/2009/20090514.asp ***

Question: My husband and some friends and I were ice fishing in the Eastern Sierras the second day of the trout opener and we all caught some nice fish. As we were leaving the ice to return to our car, one of our friends who had a long drive ahead didn't want to keep his fish and offered them to us. We already had our limits but he said, "You can have two limits in your possession so just say you caught mine yesterday." We took the fish but didn't feel right about it. Was this actually okay? (Mark S., Torrance)

Answer: No, not the way you did it. While you both were allowed to catch a limit of trout on the opening day and another limit on the second day and then have two limits in possession, by accepting his fish like you did, you could have been cited. Here's why ...

Your friend was within his rights to gift you his fish, and you were within your rights to accept them. However, without proof that these fish were actually taken legally by another licensed angler, any game warden you might meet in the parking lot or along the way that you showed your fish to would determine that you and your husband were in possession of an overlimit.

To avoid a misunderstanding like this, the best way to have handled it would have been to ask the angler giving you his additional fish to write you a note clearly stating this. The note should contain the date, his name, address, telephone number and fishing license number so that the note and your story could be verified, if necessary. Otherwise, you would likely be cited for being in possession of too many fish.

(Photo: Ice fishing picture available at www.dfg.ca.gov/QandA/2009/20090514.asp )

Question: We mainly fish near shore in the North-Central designated waters, but also fish in the San Francisco Bay and Delta areas. Can you please let me know when, where and under what circumstances a gaff can and cannot be used to boat our fish? Thank you. (Mike S.)

Answer: Gaff hooks cannot be used in the landing of any finfish shorter than their minimum size limit (Section 28.65 [d]). Remember that you're required to have a landing net aboard when fishing from a boat or other floating device to assist in landing any fish that may be smaller than the minimum size limit for that species. These nets must be on the boat or immediately available and have an opening size of not less than 18 inches in diameter.

In inland waters you may not use or even possess a gaff while on the water or within 100 yards of any river, stream, lake or reservoir (Section 2.09), except under certain conditions on the Sacramento River (see Section 2.06).

(For the purpose of this section, a gaff hook is defined as any hook with or without a handle used to assist in landing fish or to take fish in such a manner that the fish does not take the hook voluntarily in its mouth.)

Question: I have a few small pieces of scrimshaw elephant ivory that my Grandfather gave me in 1960, and an ivory piece that is actually fossilized. Is it legal to sell the pieces in California? (Ted C., Redding)

Answer: No, it is a misdemeanor to sell ivory in California (Penal Code Section 653o). According to Game Warden Patrick Foy, this section also specifically mentions several other species for which it is unlawful to sell any part thereof. Crocodiles and alligators were recently added to the list, but will not take effect until Jan 1, 2010.

This law basically says that it is illegal to import into California for commercial purposes, or to possess with intent to sell, or to sell within the state, the dead body, or any part or product thereof, of any polar bear, leopard, ocelot, tiger, cheetah, jaguar, sable antelope, wolf (Canis lupus), zebra, whale, cobra, python, sea turtle, colobus monkey, kangaroo, vicuna, sea otter, free-roaming feral horse, dolphin or porpoise (Delphinidae), Spanish lynx or elephant.

Violating any provision of this section makes the person doing so guilty of a misdemeanor. Violators are subject to a fine of not less than $1,000 (up to $5,000), up to six months in jail or both -- for each violation.



< Previous Report Next Report >




< Previous Report Next Report >


More Reports

California Department of Fish & Wildlife Reports
for Thursday, May 14th, 2009

: [MLPA Initiative] Chair Don Benninghoven statement
: [MLPA Initiative] MLPA Initiative South Coast News: Issue 5

California Department of Fish & Wildlife Reports
for Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

: California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Announcement
: California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Announcement